EAGLE S
Course/Position
Latest ports
Latest Waypoints
Latest news
Helsinki Court: Tanker remains seized
The Helsinki Court of Appeal is not considering the appeal that the Finnish police have seized the 'Eagle S', which means that the tanker is still seized. Thehe decision was made on Feb 4, after the shipping company Caravella requested the release. On Dec 27, the Central Criminal Police Office made a decision to seize the ship, which the lawyer hired by the shipping company, Herman Ljungberg, appealed to the District Court. The District Court also rejected the appeal. The police suspects gross sabotage and gross disruption of postal and telecommunications traffic in the case. Of the original crew of 24 people, eight have been banned from travelling.
No criminal investigation against crew in connection with cargo
There was no basis for a criminal investigation into the crew of the tanker "Eagle S" in connection with the shipment of Russian oil, the Finnish customs service stated on Jan 16. The ship is believed to be part of the Russian shadow fleet, which is circumventing Western sanctions against Russia's lucrative oil exports. The customs service has seized the oil. The Finnish authority reiterated that the ship's cargo consisted of products that are subject to sanctions. However, the ship is only in Finnish waters because the crew was asked to sail there by the authorities. Therefore, they have not deliberately acted in violation of the sanctions, the customs service clarified. It is not clear what consequences this may have for the crew in this case.
No criminal investigation for sanctioned cargo - shipowner lost bid to get back confiscated anchor
The 'Eagle S' has brought fuel covered by sanctions against Russia into Finnish waters, but there will be no criminal investigation, Customs said. The cargo includes unleaded gasoline and diesel, both of which are covered by sanctions against Russia. The Finnish Customs' Economic Crime Investigation Unit has therefore initiated a preliminary investigation to investigate whether the 'Eagle S' has violated sanctions legislation. Now it has been announced that there will be no criminal investigation. Although the ship brought in sanctioned goods, it was not done intentionally, but rather the ship entered Finnish territorial waters because the authorities urged the crew to do just that. The Deputy Prosecutor General has also been consulted in the case. The cargo will be detained by Customs until further notice. On Jan 15, the shipowner lost a bid to take back the ship's anchor, which Finnish authorities found on the seabed near the cable breaks. Finland's National Bureau of Investigation believes that it has evidence connecting the 'Eagle S' to the outage, when Fingrid's EstLink 2 power transmission cable and four subsea telecom cables suddenly shut down. The vessel would have caused more cable damage within 12 minutes if it had not been stopped. Possible additional targets could have included the Estlink 1 subsea cable and the Balticconnector gas pipeline, which was previously hit by an anchor-drag incident in 2023. Shortly after the anchor was recovered and brought ashore for forensic analysis, the vessel's attorney filed a court appeal to force the police to release it to the shipowner, the UAE-based Caravella LLC FZ. Herman Ljungberg, counsel for Caravella, told YLE that Finnish police had no jurisdiction over the vessel or her anchor. Since both were in international waters at the time they were taken into custody, he asserted, Finland's law enforcement reach did not extend to either. The court disagreed with this interpretation and ruled in favour of the NBI, and the anchor will remain in custody. The bureau's attorneys argued successfully that Finnish law gives them jurisdiction when international acts target Finland,for example, when a ship cuts an international cable that connects to Finnish soil. Ljungberg said that he would appeal the matter to the Court of Appeal and attempt to regain full control of the ship and the lost anchor. If the legal process takes too long, the 'Eagle S' may get trapped in the Baltic Sea's ice season, and would be exposed to conditions for which the vessel was not designed; given that the ship costs about $15,000 per day in upkeep, The anonymous single-ship holding company may simply abandon her and walk away. Even if the owner leaves the ship behind and stops paying for wages and operating expenses, the nine crew members who are suspected of involvement in the cable incident must remain. They are confined to the ship and are under a travel ban to prevent them from leaving the country while the inquiry continues.
Upload News